evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers [2013/09/24 13:47] – laurent | evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers [2023/04/25 16:52] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Evaluation of speech synthesizers ====== | ====== Evaluation of speech synthesizers ====== | ||
- | ^ Nom ^ OS ^ Licence ^ Price ^ Website ^ Quality ^ multilingual | + | ^ Preference ^ Name / link ^ OS ^ Licence ^ Price ^ Quality ^ Multilingual |
- | | eSpeak | Win - Nux | Opensource | + | |1| [[http:// |
- | | Kali | Win | proprietary | ? | http:// | + | |2| [[http:// |
+ | |3| Pico svox [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http://wiki.freeswitch.org/ | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[https:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | === Others links: === | ||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | ==== Conclusions: | ||
+ | **eSpeak** topped the ranking: GPL, many languages, | ||
+ | Its only flaw is its very low quality. In practice, this raises the problem of understanding. | ||
+ | It still remains that we have to integrate default, it is the most universal. | ||
+ | Then comes **MBrola**, although it is not free software license, it is freely redistributable for non commercial projects, free, available in many languages and it is especially good in terms of understanding. | ||
+ | We need to be able to use it. | ||
- | TO TEST : | + | **Pico SVOX** has the advantage of being open source, good quality |
- | - Eloquence | + | |
- | - pico | + | |
- | - Volubil | + | |
- | - CLC-4-TTS | + | |
- | - Festival | + | |
- | - Sayz Me | + | |
- | - FreeTTS | + | |
- | - Orca | + | |
- | - freeswitch | + |
evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers.1380030424.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/04/25 16:52 (external edit)