evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers
no way to compare when less than two revisions
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Previous revisionLast revision | |||
— | evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers [2015/05/15 20:00] – laurent | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Evaluation of speech synthesizers ====== | ||
+ | ^ Preference ^ Name / link ^ OS ^ Licence ^ Price ^ Quality ^ Multilingual ^ | ||
+ | |1| [[http:// | ||
+ | |2| [[http:// | ||
+ | |3| Pico svox [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[https:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | === Others links: === | ||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | ==== Conclusions: | ||
+ | **eSpeak** topped the ranking: GPL, many languages, | ||
+ | Its only flaw is its very low quality. In practice, this raises the problem of understanding. | ||
+ | It still remains that we have to integrate default, it is the most universal. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then comes **MBrola**, although it is not free software license, it is freely redistributable for non commercial projects, free, available in many languages and it is especially good in terms of understanding. | ||
+ | We need to be able to use it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Pico SVOX** has the advantage of being open source, good quality and multi OS. But it is only available in a few languages. |
evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers.txt · Last modified: 2023/04/25 16:52 by 127.0.0.1