evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers [2013/11/13 18:14] – laurent | evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers [2015/05/15 19:59] – laurent | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Evaluation of speech synthesizers ====== | ====== Evaluation of speech synthesizers ====== | ||
- | ^ Preference ^ Name/link ^ OS ^ Licence ^ Price ^ Quality ^ Multilingual ^ | + | ^ Preference ^ Name / link ^ OS ^ Licence ^ Price ^ Quality ^ Multilingual ^ |
|1| [[http:// | |1| [[http:// | ||
- | | | [[http://www.crisco.unicaen.fr/Presentation-de-Kali.html|Kali]] | Win | proprietary | + | |2| [[http://tcts.fpms.ac.be/ |
- | |2| [[http://tcts.fpms.ac.be/synthesis/|MBrola]] | | ok for redistribute | free | good | 35+ | | + | |3| Pico svox [[http://bertrand.lambard.free.fr/? |
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
+ | | | [[http:// | ||
| | [[http:// | | | [[http:// | ||
| | [[https:// | | | [[https:// | ||
| | [[http:// | | | [[http:// | ||
| | [[http:// | | | [[http:// | ||
- | |3| Pico svox | Win Linux OSX | open source | free | Good | EN ES FR IT DE| | + | | | [[http:// |
- | | | [[http:// | + | | | [[http://www.crisco.unicaen.fr/Presentation-de-Kali.html|Kali]] | Win | proprietary |
- | | | [[http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Main_Page|Freeswitch]] | Linux Win OSX| Mozilla Public | free | | | | + | |
- | | | [[http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
[[http:// | [[http:// | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | ==== Conclusions: | ||
+ | **eSpeak** topped the ranking: GPL, many languages, | ||
+ | Its only flaw is its very low quality. In practice, this raises the problem of understanding. | ||
+ | It still remains that we have to integrate default, it is the most universal. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then comes **MBrola**, although it is not free software license, it is freely redistributable for non commercial projects, free, available in many languages and it is especially good in terms of understanding. | ||
+ | We need to be able to use it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Pico SVOX** has the advantage of being open source, good quality and multi OS. But it is only available in a few languages. |
evaluation_of_speech_synthesizers.txt · Last modified: 2023/04/25 16:52 by 127.0.0.1